|
March 8, 2014 |
|
In Hong Kong, the mass media is an indispensable part of people's lives. Not only does it affect the way people think and act, it also plays an active role in the economic and cultural domains of the society, shaping the economy and cultural values of the people. The mass media is also a kind of business. Just like other commercial utilities, mass media produce infotainment and sell it to the buyers (targeted audience) for profit. Mass media in Hong Kong can be classified according to their nature into 3 categories:
Legislation on the media industry Freedom of the press and publication are enshrined in Art. 27 of the Hong Kong Basic Law|Basic Law, Hong Kong's mini-constitution, and are also protected by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) under Art. 39 of the Hong Kong Basic Law| Basic Law. There is no law called "media law" in Hong Kong. Instead, the media is governed by a bunch of statutory laws. In brief, there are 31 Ordinances that are directly related to mass media, 7 of which are more important. They includes Registration of Local Newspapers Ordinance (Cap. 286), Books Registration Ordinance (Cap. 142), Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap. 106), Control of Obscene and Indecent Articles Ordinance (Cap. 390) Broadcasting Authority Ordinance (Cap. 391) and Broadcasting Ordinance (Cap. 562).
The rest of the 31 Ordinances are of less importance since they do not aim at regulating mass media, but some of their provisions do affect the operation of media organizations and also the freedom of the press. The passing of Bill of Rights Ordinance(BORO) in 1986 strengthened the protection of fundamental human rights like Freedom of the press|press freedom, freedom of speech, etc. This has been reflected in the loosening of control over mass media. Laws that violate the principle of press freedom are gradually amended. (For example, s.27 of Public Order Ordinance, which criminalized publishing of false news, was repealed in 1989) Nonetheless, there are still concerns among the media sectors that laws some existing laws may still undermine the freedom of the press and publication, e.g. Official Secrets Ordinance (Cap. 521) and Public Order Ordinance (Cap. 245). On the other hand, the HKSAR Government considers that such laws do not violate the BORO and the constitutionally protected rights under the Hong Kong Basic Law|Basic Law. Authorities enforcing relevant policies
Characteristic of Hong Kong's Mass Media
Challenges faced by Media In 1999, a survey on the mass media ethics was conducted by four journalists' groups (http://www.freeway.org.hk/hkja/ Hong Kong Journalists Association, Hong Kong News Executives' Association, Hong Kong Federation of Journalists, Hong Kong Press Photographers' Association ). They could not deny the fact that the mass media were suffering decreasing respect of Hong Kong citizens. Journalism was no longer seen as a respectable profession. The Public had little trust in newspapers. The news industry attributed this phenomenon to Hong Kong citizens' complaints about the decreasing ethics of journalists. This survey has revealed the problems that mass media industry is now facing. Over 75% people were not satisfied with journalists' ethical behavior. 81% agreed that the journalists had injected too much violence and pornography into news reporting. 66% stated that there was a lack of accuracy in reporting. Stories were exaggerated and contorted to cater for the readers' taste. And 62% thought that journalists did not respect individual privacy. The victims were usually the super stars and celebrities. However, Hong Kong people still had much concern about press freedom. In 2000, the 'United State Policy Act Report' pointed out that Hong Kong media still remained free and robust after reunification with China in 1997. Mass media had the absolute freedom to report and comment and criticise every event that happened in Hong Kong,Taiwan, People's Republic of China|Mainland China and other regions around the world. The majority did agree that the supervisory duty should not rely on the government. Over 60% support the proposal that a non-governmental organisation, composed by group of professional journalist should be set up for strict and close supervision. In view of this request of the public, http://www.presscouncil.org.hk/ Hong Kong Press Council, an independent organization, was founded in 2000 to promote the ethical stands of the newspaper industry, to fight for press freedom and to deal with public complaints. "Mr Chan Kin Hong (陳健康) Incident" On 19 October 1998, a woman, together with her 2 children, jumped down from a tall building in Sheung Shui and died. The local media quickly turned their attention to Mr. Chan Kin Hong, the woman's husband. It was alleged that Mrs Chan committed suicide because her husband had taken another wife in mainland China. Chan then became the headlines of major newspapers and TV channels, being portrayed as both a disgraceful husband and a living example of trans-boundary marital problems between Hong Kong and mainland China. During the media's wild chase of the story, the Apple Daily was so eager to outstrip its competitors that it posted a picture that ruined its reputation. In the picture Chan was holding 2 women, whom were said to be prostitutes, in his arms - all three were cuddling under a bedsheet inside a hotel room. On one hand public resentment against Chan reached its peak, but the readers could not help wondering, how did the Apple Daily manage to get this picture? Later on it was found that the Apple Daily had paid Chan HK$5,000 for the story. Alternative version of the story: the Apple Daily never paid Chan directly in cash, but their reporters paid for Chan's meals and "entertainment" expenses during the process of "reporting", including the fees for the prostitutes. Finally, the Apple Daily posted a whole-page notice of apology on its front page on November 10, 1998. The incident sparked off fierce criticism from other media, academics and the public. One of the issues of discussion was that, if journalists start to fabricate the very reality that they claim to report, or worse still, if they actively take part in creating social tragedies, journalism is parting from its ethics and social role. A tarnished reputation of media ethics left Hong Kong's freedom of press more vulnerable to the much-suspected censorship after 1997. Spreading of false news during SARS period On April Fools' Day in 2003, a 14-year-old pupil copied the design of the Ming Pao Web site to his own, wherein he announced that Hong Kong had been declared an "infected port", the Chief Executive of Hong Kong|Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa had stepped down and that the Hang Seng|Hang Seng Index had plunged. Rumour had it that Hong Kong would be quarantined and cut off from supplies, which immediately sparked panic buying at supermarkets and prompted the government to issue an official denial in an emergency briefing and through Short message service|SMS messages to mobile phone users. Newspapers overwhelmingly condemned the spread of misinformation in times of the SARS crisis. Ming Pao in particular demanded the punishment of the spread of false news in the public interest. This raised a discussion on the choice between freedom of speech and the public interest. The person who spread the rumor had subsequently been arrested. Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23|Basic Law Article 23 Legislation The legislation to implement Article 23 of the Hong Kong Basic Law|Basic Law, which concerns the prohibition of crimes against national security, has been one of the most controversial issues since the reunification of Hong Kong with Mainland China in 1997. Among the laws proposed to implement Article 23, the media were most concerned about the offences of handling sedition|seditious publications and unlawful disclosure of official secrets. There are worries among the media sector, as well as the legal and human rights groups, that the amendments would endanger the freedom of the press in Hong Kong. In particular, the media sector had argued strongly for a "Public interest defense|public interest Defense (legal)|defence" under the Official Secrets Ordinance (Cap. 521), the secrecy law of Hong Kong inherited from the United Kingdom, but the Government considered the defence http://www.basiclaw23.gov.hk/english/focus/focus2.htm not necessary and refused to add the defence. After a huge protest of up to 500,000 people in Hong Kong on July 1, 2003 to voice dissatisfaction against the legislation and the Government, the defence was finally accepted by the Government. Nevertheless, in a few days, the Government was forced to postpone the Second reading|second and Third reading|third readings of the Bill due to the resignation of Mr James Tien, Chairman of Liberal Party (Hong Kong)|Liberal Party, from the Executive Council of Hong Kong|Executive Council. Finally, on September 5, 2003, the Government announced withdrawal of the Bill. Naked famous actress photos Some naked photos of a famous actress were distributed in East Magazine, and in Three Weekly a week later. The photos were claimed to be taken in early 90's when that actress was kidnapped. Though people from all social strata have shouted themselves hoarse to call on citizens to boycott the publications, many bought and read them even while condemning them for corrupting public morals; those issues of East Magazine and Three Weekly have sold very well. Such inconsistent behaviour has led to a situation qualified as deplorable by many. Media ethics were raised as a hot topic; people investing in or working for "vile" publications were much criticized. As the public pressure grew, East Magazine finally closed down.
(by the end of year 2002) Media Institutes Television|TV:
See also:
Radio
Newspapers See: Newspapers of Hong Kong Magazines
Public space media
Media organizations
Category:Hong Kong media|* This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Media in Hong Kong".
|
|
|||
All informatin on the site is © FamousChinese.com 2002-2005. Last revised: January 2, 2004 Are you interested in our site or/and want to use our information? please read how to contact us and our copyrights. To post your business in our web site? please click here. To send any comments to us, please use the Feedback. To let us provide you with high quality information, you can help us by making a more or less donation: |